It is easy to cut costs but there is usually an associated trade-off. If you want properly run organizations there are costs associated with that. Putting in place privacy protections and security of computer networks costs money although poor privacy hurts everyone. ![]() They were not aware that they needed to have annual meetings. I recently was involved in an organization that had been around for over 20 years and had never had an annual members meeting. Good corporate governance such as regular board meetings costs money. With such a large part of our society working for non-profits and charities if the jobs would not compensate people properly ten percent of our population would be worse off. Paying people a living wage is more expensive than exploiting them. Avoiding almost all legal and accounting fees may seem like a good idea until there is a far bigger and more expensive problem or risk/liability that arises needlessly that requires an expensive solution. ![]() Trying to have a charity operate within the legal and accounting rules is more expensive than just ignoring them. It is cheaper to have records kept in a basement and it may work until there is a sewage backup or basement flood. Having an office with a proper filing system costs money. Regularly monitoring activities and evaluating those activities is more expensive than dispensing with the monitoring and evaluation and just doing the program in perpetuity because you have always done so. Having proper financial controls costs money. Communication with stakeholders and other interested groups costs money. Putting out an annual report takes time and money. In my experience, transparency and accountability are expensive. They may be doing a good job or a poor job – but sometimes you have no idea. Some groups, especially small ethnic or religious groups, can keep fundraising and admin costs very low (1-5% range) but they are sometimes all-volunteer groups that work within one small community and there are sometimes issues of transparency and accountability and the sustainability of the organization if the volunteers curtail their efforts. If all donors and funders required that 100% of their funds go to programming costs and no money is spent on administration, fundraising, governance, and all the other things keeping charities alive then most charities would not exist in a year or two. At that point, in my mind, the idea that 100% of the funds are going to charitable programs is purely a marketing gimmick and I would avoid people or charities who make such claims. While the T3010 is public, tax returns for non-profits and for-profits are not. Yes, it is possible for a charity to have 100% of their funds going to charitable programs if it is going to bury the real costs of administration and fundraising in an affiliated non-profit or a for-profit corporation, etc. ![]() Some difficult ‘philanthropists’ don’t really care about the costs of running a charity, as distinct from the cost of implementing a particular project, they just insist that none of ‘their’ donation should go to overhead – that charade only works if there are enough people who make undesignated gifts that will pay for the operation of the charity. In fact, many charities could take in a lot, and spend nothing, and still be compliant with their disbursement quota obligations. The 80/20 rule is very misleading in terms of overhead as many charities receipt little of their donations and therefore can legally spend much less than 80% of their revenue in the previous year on the subsequent year’s activities and still be compliant with the disbursement quota. Some people use the 80/20 rule because the Canadian disbursement quota (DQ) requires charities in most cases to spend 80% of the amount receipted by the charity in the previous year on charitable activities in the following year. I do not like the term “overhead” – it has a slightly pejorative sound to it which is unfair as overhead is generally necessary for an organization to run well and be sustainable. I am occasionally asked ‘what is an appropriate amount for administration and fundraising’, what is commonly referred to as “overhead”. Here is my updated article on “How Much Should A Canadian Charity Spend on Overhead” Why low overhead may not be a good thing for a charity and what is appropriate?
0 Comments
![]() 50 Highland Crest Baptist Church 88 580 Report Follow Highland Crest Baptist Church and others on SoundCloud. Highland Crest Baptist Church 1 year ago Religion & Spirituality Comments are disabled for this track.Highland Crest Baptist Church House Churches at, WI, 54304 Highland Crest Baptist Church in Green Bay, Wisconsin - Local Highland Christian Church - Wikipedia WebHighland Crest Baptist Church - Facebook briar rose daycare hillsboro Highlands Baptist Church Centennial CO - Facebook ![]() Feel free to share prayer … covent garden to tower hill tube A great way to keep in touch with your immediate church family. WebThis group is for members and regular attendees of Highland Crest Baptist Church. The new facilities the church is building will assist them in more strategically reaching others for Christ in a more progressive, 21st century model for ministry.
![]() You wouldn’t want to use PowerShell if you are looking to fix minor issues or to simply check your ping details.Remote agent running as a Windows Service does not pick up the PATH variable correctly The command prompt will still be used by a lot of users (including the programmers) to carry out less-advanced but important things – like cleaning your hard drive, converting your drive from GPT to MBR, recovering from a shortcut virus and so on. However, if you are not a programmer and have got no idea what system administrators do – you should stick to Command Prompt. In addition, if you know about C# programming language, that would perfectly do the job. ![]() If you know about creating scripts, managing automated administration tasks in Windows, and want more extensibility doing that – then PowerShell is for you. Set-Location / Get-children / Rename-item Windows PowerShell vs Command Prompt: Which One Should You Be Using?Ĭonsidering that PowerShell is a lot more advanced command-line environment, it is only suitable for Windows system administrators. However, with Powershell, you will get the commands to be more expressive (describing about their working), like: That’s why it still is the easiest command-line tool. When you observe a command like cd / dir / rename (one word commands), that’s command prompt for you. If you simply want to know the basic difference in their commands, then here’s that: If you are going to utilize either of them most of the time, you should take a good look at their documentation here: In a nutshell, PowerShell is an improved command-line environment when compared to the command prompt. PowerShell also lets you utilize – ”Pipes” – which is just a way to easily facilitate the transfer of information from one program to another – this makes PowerShell even more powerful.Īlso, as stated above, with PowerShell, you can create complex scripts but that’s not going to happen with the command prompt. However, you can’t access the same via command prompt. ![]() You can try controlling a lot of system administration tasks with it. PowerShell uses a different set of commands known as cmdlets. If you have no idea what a programming language is – knowing the technical differences won’t help you. The technical differences would only matter to someone who wants to manage and automate certain tasks by interacting with the OS via a command-line interface. And, recently (in 2016), the PowerShell was made open-source with cross-platform support. Later, in the year – 2006 – it was renamed to Microsoft PowerShell. Well, in theory, it was almost the same as COMMAND.COM (or popularly known as MS-DOS) with a lot of improvements on board. And, then with Windows NT, it was dubbed as – “Command Prompt”. At that time, it wasn’t called the – “Command Prompt” but just “cmd.exe” which let users interact with the operating system via certain commands. It exists on Windows since the introduction of Windows 95. The command prompt is a command-line interpreter. To keep things easy, we will not dive deep into the roots of how they are different but only the significant difference between PowerShell vs cmd will be highlighted in this article to help you choose which one to utilize. We have got everything you need to know about both of them. But, can it be used as a replacement for the command prompt? Is it only for the programmers or is it easy to get acquainted with? Well, I’m sure – unless you are a power user with programming knowledge, you won’t have even bothered opening the PowerShell. But, what about PowerShell which came into existence later? What is the difference between PowerShell and cmd? ![]() Most of you must have used the command prompt at some point in time – whether just for the sake of trying out an experiment or fixing an issue like recovering the data after getting affected by a shortcut virus. This relates to “efficacy” in light bulbs. A 40 watt bulb will go for about 450 lumens. A 60 watt bulb will equal about 800 lumens. Similarly, go for 1100 lumens to replace a 75 watt bulb. ![]() Generally speaking, look for a bulb that provides about 1600 lumens if you’re used to buying 100 watt bulbs. What Lumen Value Should I Be Looking For In My Lights? If you’re used to looking for watts, don’t stress about swapping over to lumens. Lux is the amount of light on a surface in front of the light bulb. Watts are the amount of power needed for the light bulb. Lumens are the amount of light from the light bulb. “Therefore, the amount of lux in an area or on a surface can vary depending upon the distance the light travels and the angle at which it is dispersed.” The further the light has to travel the more it will be dispersed,” according to Banner Engineering. Essentially, as light travels from the emitter, it will disperse throughout an area. “One lux is equal to one lumen per square meter (lux = lumens/m2). (It’s worth mentioning this isn’t a perfect metaphor.) Returning to our metaphor, it’s like the amount of water from your hose in a particular spot in your yard. That’s the intensity of light within a specific area. That’s luminance, which is measured in lux. In other words, that’s not the same thing.Ī lumen is also not the amount of light on a surface. Going back to our metaphor, think of it like how much pressure is needed to push a few drops out of the hose or a constant stream. ![]() A watt is the energy per second required by a bulb. Many of us may confuse watts with lumens, which seems logical, but they’re not the same. In the case of commercial LED light strings, you’d generally want the latter. Sometimes it’s only a few drops at a time, other times it’s a few gallons. Think of a lumen like the amount of water coming out of a hose. That means nothing to anyone but top-tier nerds.Ī lumen is the amount of light seen by the eye coming from a single source, like a lightbulb, according to a publication from the National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO). Luminous flux in lumens = Radiant power (watts) x 683 lumens/watt x luminous efficacy” according to HyperPhysics, a publication from Georgia State University. In terms of radiant power (also called radiant flux) it can be expressed as: The abbreviation is lm and the symbol is Φv. It can be defined as the luminous flux emitted into unit solid angle (1 sr) by an isotropic point source having a luminous intensity of 1 candela. It is an SI derived unit based on the candela. ![]() “The lumen is the standard unit for the luminous flux of a light source. The formal answer to this question is horrendous. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |